Reflection on Rheingold’s video
In Rheingold’s (2008) dialog, he claims
that humans do have a basic instinct to work with others. Evolution is the key
to interaction as a group. Back in the days,
it was “the survival of the fittest”, but as the world matured and
language/socialization started to emerge, it became the main frame and people
began to realize that in order for some things to get accomplished, teamwork
was the answer. He discusses the importance of Wikipedia as a collective
developed encyclopedia which contains a summary of human knowledge. Rheingold
(2008) states that the alphabet was the changing factor and a very powerful
tool declaring “new forms of wealth emerged” and still going strong today. In my opinion, it is a matter of do you want
to work with others or work individually? I like to do both. Sometimes too many
chiefs is not beneficial, but on the flip side, when one chief drops the ball
(so to speak), the other one is there to pick up the pieces. We all learn from
each other’s teaching methods and gain knowledge. I think it really depends on
the task at hand if collaboration is a key tool or not.
Technology can play a part in facilitating
collaboration through the use of blogs, office, podcasts, docs, wikis,
discussion boards, and other technologies. Discovery learning is the primary
thought process where learners develop their own knowledge through analysis of
their own familiarities. Discovery learning does not mean that it is unguided,
it means that learners
will be provided with the tools, resources, and necessary support to guide them
through their own learning manner.
Collaboration is defined as “a
recursive process where two or more people...work together toward an
intersection of common goals...by sharing knowledge, learning, and building
consensus” (Lomas, Burke & Page. 2008). Constructivism offers multiple ways
of learning which allows for greater success.
“The Internet offers multiple pathways to learning, using
hypertext/hypermedia as a constructivist learning tool. Carefully designed materials
presented online can assist individuals’ construction of knowledge by providing
alternative pathways to information and making that information easily accessible
from any location that has system facilities” (How does Technology Facilitate
Constructivist Learning).
The study below provides insight on how teachers examined themselves
team teaching with others. It goes on to reveal how the teachers learned and
discovered the benefits of collaborative work.
Here are some responses from teachers
after working collaboratively together; ““I mean it took so
much time…but then we became much more at ease with the process and I think
also much more comfortable with each other and we began to collaborate in a
much more fluid way” and “the presence of another pushed us to go deeper,
emphasizes the opportunity for reflective practice through the process
of collaborative teaching” (Lester & Evans, 2009). http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ869322.pdf
References
Driscoll, M. P. (2005). Psychology of learning for
instruction (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education
Lester, J. N., & Evans, K. R. (2009).
Instructors' Experiences of Collaboratively Teaching: Building Something
Bigger. International Journal Of Teaching And Learning In Higher Education,
20(3), 373-382.
Lomas, C., Burke, M. & Page, C.L. (2008).
Collaborative Tools. Retrieved from: net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eli3020.pdf
Rheingold, H. (2008, February). Howard Rheingold on
collaboration [Video file]. Retrieved from:
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/howard_rheingold_on_collaboration.html
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/howard_rheingold_on_collaboration.html
I have replied to:
Joy https://avery7105.wordpress.com/
Diana
http://dianaeduc8845.blogspot.com/
I liked your post. It helped me understand some of the questions. "Sometimes too many chiefs is not beneficial, but on the flip side, when one chief drops the ball (so to speak), the other one is there to pick up the pieces. We all learn from each other’s teaching methods and gain knowledge. I think it really depends on the task at hand if collaboration is a key tool or not." This is so true. We have the "chiefs" problem at school. But one of the "chief"s has real issues actually doing the stuff she is asked to do in a timely hour. For example, she was asked three days before her fundraiser dance, to share the profits with me. This was not planned by me, I was very blindsided. I felt awful, but the Principal had asked her to take care approaching it in September not February.
ReplyDeleteThere is no course of action for the Principal with her negligence for several of her responsibilities.
You gave a great explanation for constructivism and technology.
Joy Flack Avery
Thanks Joy! So sorry to hear about your 'chiefs' issue at your school-entirely unfair to you. So is there where we have to take the good and bad and not make waves? So much for collaborating on that project!!! Yours is another example of too many chief's aren't beneficial. Let's be hopeful that some of these situations become learning moments.
Delete